Archive · 2026-08

August 2026,
frozen.

These figures were written once, at month close on 1 Sept 2026, and cannot be edited. Cite them freely: this page will read the same in a year.

What this is: a public monthly record of what AI model prices actually did, which providers moved them, and which model is still the cheapest one good enough for a given job.

410

Models tracked

Active entries in the live catalog.

71

Providers tracked

Distinct real providers with at least one live price. Aggregator listings are excluded.

3,054

Price moves in August 2026

954 up · 2100 down. 386 new listings are counted separately.

Number of the month

+1337%

DeepSeek V3.2, same weights

$0.209 at GMICloud against $3.00 at Mara, per MTok in.

Direction

3054 recorded price moves in August 2026: 2100 cuts and 954 rises, so the market moved down on balance. 69% of all moves were cuts.

Four terms this page uses

MTok
One million tokens. Every price on this page is US dollars per million tokens, so models with different token accounting stay comparable.
Price move
One observed change to a live listed price, recorded in the append-only ledger with its direction. A model appearing for the first time is a new listing, never a move. Full definition.
Provider spread
The gap between the cheapest and dearest host serving identical weights. It is a routing choice, not a quality difference.
Equivalence band
The score range around your current model, widened by the benchmark's own measurement margin, that a candidate must sit inside before a switch is offered.

Price moves

What changed in August 2026

Recorded from the append-only price ledger: every observed move, per model and per host, on both the input and output side.

3054price movesAugust 2026
  • Decreases2100
  • Increases954
  • New listings386
  • Total moves counts increases plus decreases only. New listings are shown here for context and are never folded into that total.
3,054

Total moves

Increases plus decreases. New listings are not folded in.

954

Increases

2,100

Decreases

107

New models

First seen in August 2026.

Top 5 increases

  • z-ai/glm-5.2

    Baidu

    +1150.0%

    blended

    $0.112 → $1.40 in (+1150.0%) · $0.352 → $4.40 out (+1150.0%)

  • z-ai/glm-5.2

    OpenRouter

    +585.3%

    blended

    $0.112 → $0.760 in (+578.6%) · $0.352 → $2.42 out (+587.5%)

  • deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731

    Cloudflare

    +576.9%

    blended

    $0.080 → $0.440 in (+450.0%) · $0.180 → $1.32 out (+633.3%)

  • z-ai/glm-5.2

    StreamLake

    +500.0%

    blended

    $0.070 → $0.420 in (+500.0%) · $0.220 → $1.32 out (+500.0%)

  • z-ai/glm-5.2

    Novita

    +415.5%

    blended

    $0.081 → $0.419 in (+415.5%) · $0.255 → $1.32 out (+415.5%)

Top 5 decreases

  • deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731

    Cloudflare

    -85.2%

    blended

    $0.440 → $0.080 in (-81.8%) · $1.32 → $0.180 out (-86.4%)

  • openai/gpt-5.6-luna

    Azure

    -80.0%

    blended

    $1.00 → $0.200 in (-80.0%) · $6.00 → $1.20 out (-80.0%)

  • openai/gpt-5.6-luna-pro

    Azure

    -80.0%

    blended

    $1.00 → $0.200 in (-80.0%) · $6.00 → $1.20 out (-80.0%)

  • ~deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-latest

    OpenRouter

    -77.6%

    blended

    $0.035 → $0.040 in (+14.3%) · $0.500 → $0.080 out (-84.0%)

  • deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

    GMICloud

    -76.1%

    blended

    $0.352 → $0.112 in (-68.2%) · $1.06 → $0.224 out (-78.8%)

Who reprices most

Ranked over everything we hold. The leaderboard updates as more price moves are recorded.

  • 1OpenRouter879moves · 81 models
  • 2Baidu614moves · 8 models
  • 3StreamLake555moves · 8 models
  • 4Novita176moves · 6 models
  • 5DeepSeek156moves · 5 models
  • 6GMICloud148moves · 17 models
  • 7Mancer 277moves · 5 models
  • 8Alibaba62moves · 5 models

Market structure

The same weights cost wildly different money

Identical model, different real provider. Aggregator listings are excluded, so every gap below is a genuine provider-to-provider spread you could act on today.

143

Models on 2+ providers

1

Median providers per model

30

Most providers on one model

232
162%
75
2–320%
46
4–912%
22
10+6%

Providers per model, across 375 models with at least one real (non-aggregator) endpoint. Most weights are single-sourced; a small tail is served everywhere, and that tail is where the spread lives.

  • DeepSeek V3.2

    deepseek/deepseek-v3.2

    $0.209$3.00

    GMICloud → Mara · 15 providers · per MTok in

    +1337%

    spread

  • gpt-oss-120b

    openai/gpt-oss-120b

    $0.030$0.350

    AkashML → Cerebras · 18 providers · per MTok in

    +1067%

    spread

  • Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

    meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct

    $0.020$0.220

    Novita → CoreWeave · 5 providers · per MTok in

    +1000%

    spread

  • Gemma 4 31B

    google/gemma-4-31b-it

    $0.090$0.990

    DeepInfra → Cerebras · 14 providers · per MTok in

    +1000%

    spread

  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

    meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct

    $0.100$1.04

    DeepInfra → Together · 12 providers · per MTok in

    +940%

    spread

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

    deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731

    $0.050$0.440

    OpenInference → Cloudflare · 30 providers · per MTok in

    +780%

    spread

  • MythoMax 13B

    gryphe/mythomax-l2-13b

    $0.060$0.400

    NextBit → Mancer 2 · 4 providers · per MTok in

    +567%

    spread

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

    deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

    $0.068$0.440

    DigitalOcean → Cloudflare · 17 providers · per MTok in

    +548%

    spread

Quality per dollar

The cheapest model that still clears the band

For each task class we take the leading published score, subtract that evaluation's measured margin, and pick the cheapest model still above the line. Only suites with a real measured margin appear, because a benchmark without one cannot back a claim.

  • gpqa

    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

    deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

    Scores 90.80 on aa:gpqa; bar 89.90 (leader 94.90 − margin ±5.00). 34 models clear it. Cheapest listing at DigitalOcean.

    cheapest qualifying 90.80bar 89.90leader 94.90band width ±5.00 (measured margin)
    $0.068

    per MTok in

  • hle

    Claude Opus 5

    anthropic/claude-opus-5

    Scores 54.90 on aa:hle; bar 53.88 (leader 55.50 − margin ±1.62). 2 models clear it. Cheapest listing at Claude Platform on AWS.

    cheapest qualifying 54.90bar 53.88leader 55.50band width ±1.62 (measured margin)
    $5.00

    per MTok in

  • lcr

    GPT-5.6 Luna

    openai/gpt-5.6-luna

    Scores 78.33 on aa:lcr; bar 78.33 (leader 83.33 − margin ±5.00). 14 models clear it. Cheapest listing at OpenAI.

    cheapest qualifying 78.33bar 78.33leader 83.33band width ±5.00 (measured margin)
    $0.100

    per MTok in

  • scicode

    Gemini 3.7 Flash

    google/gemini-3.7-flash

    Scores 56.80 on aa:scicode; bar 55.20 (leader 60.20 − margin ±5.00). 11 models clear it. Cheapest listing at Google AI Studio.

    cheapest qualifying 56.80bar 55.20leader 60.20band width ±5.00 (measured margin)
    $0.375

    per MTok in

  • tau_banking

    GLM 5.3 Flash

    z-ai/glm-5.3-flash

    Scores 47.22 on aa:tau_banking; bar 46.34 (leader 51.34 − margin ±5.00). 6 models clear it. Cheapest listing at Relace.

    cheapest qualifying 47.22bar 46.34leader 51.34band width ±5.00 (measured margin)
    $0.071

    per MTok in

  • terminalbench_v2_1

    GLM 5.3 Flash

    z-ai/glm-5.3-flash

    Scores 84.27 on aa:terminalbench_v2_1; bar 84.14 (leader 89.14 − margin ±5.00). 10 models clear it. Cheapest listing at Relace.

    cheapest qualifying 84.27bar 84.14leader 89.14band width ±5.00 (measured margin)
    $0.071

    per MTok in

Benchmark saturation

An evaluation stops being usable when the spread between models collapses into the measurement margin. We require the observed spread to exceed twice the margin; a ratio at or below 1.0 means the instrument can no longer tell models apart.

  • tau_banking · aa:tau_banking

    spread 50.31 vs margin ±8.29 across 80 scored models, discriminating.

    3.03×vs 1.0× floor
  • scicode · aa:scicode

    spread 43.20 vs margin ±5.23 across 146 scored models, discriminating.

    4.13×vs 1.0× floor
  • terminalbench_v2_1 · aa:terminalbench_v2_1

    spread 85.77 vs margin ±10.35 across 80 scored models, discriminating.

    4.14×vs 1.0× floor
  • lcr · aa:lcr

    spread 81.67 vs margin ±9.69 across 131 scored models, discriminating.

    4.22×vs 1.0× floor
  • gpqa · aa:gpqa

    spread 60.00 vs margin ±5.88 across 147 scored models, discriminating.

    5.11×vs 1.0× floor
  • hle · aa:hle

    spread 53.70 vs margin ±1.62 across 146 scored models, discriminating.

    16.60×vs 1.0× floor

Newsletter

These numbers, weekly.

One email a week: the price moves we recorded, which switches cleared quality, and what changed for the cheapest model good enough for a given job. No pitch, unsubscribe in one click.

Method

How a switch gets measured

  • Price sync at freeze

    The prices on this page are the catalog as it stood when this month was frozen. The engine itself keeps re-syncing from public provider feeds; the live page reflects that, this archive deliberately does not.

  • Independent benchmark scores

    Quality comes from published third-party evaluations, per task class. We do not run our own private eval and we are never paid for placement.

  • The equivalence band

    A candidate model only qualifies when its score sits inside the band around your current model for the task class in question. Cheaper-but-worse never clears.

  • Measurement margin

    Every score carries its own uncertainty. We compute the real margin and require the gap to survive it before a switch is offered.

  • Latency ceilings

    Median latency is part of the decision, not an afterthought. Set a ceiling and candidates that breach it are dropped before cost is even compared.

  • Refusals with reasons

    When nothing clears, you get a stated reason, not a weaker suggestion. A quiet downgrade would cost you more than the saving is worth.

Cite and reuse

Take the numbers with you

Every figure here is free to quote, repost or chart, with attribution to CostMyAI. We would rather be the cited source than the hidden one.

Citation

CostMyAI Intelligence, August 2026. Retrieved 1 Sept 2026. https://www.costmyai.com/intelligence/2026-08

Permanent link

https://www.costmyai.com/intelligence/2026-08?ref=share&card=cite

Download the table

Same figures, same identifiers as the anchors on this page, so a chart you build from the file matches the page it came from.

Every figure card on this page carries its own image and a ready post with the source line already in it.

Embed

Put the live market on your own page

A self-contained frame that rotates the three sharpest numbers of the month: how many prices moved, the steepest rise and the steepest cut. It refreshes itself, needs no script on your site, and always credits CostMyAI.

<iframe src="https://costmyai.com/embed/intelligence-widget"
  title="AI price market, via CostMyAI"
  width="100%" height="200" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;max-width:520px"
  referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin"></iframe>
  • RotationMonth-over-month move count, biggest rise, biggest cut.
  • FreshnessServer-cached and refreshed every five minutes.
  • SafetyIsolated iframe, no script in your page, nothing configurable.
  • AttributionThe “via CostMyAI” link is part of the widget on every plan.

Archive

Every closed month, frozen and permanently linkable

At 00:00 UTC on the first of each month we write that month's final figures once and never touch them again. A correction is filed as a new restatement row that points back at the original, so the number you cited stays exactly as you cited it.